“‘The Vatican wants to show its appreciation for science.'” Reuters (06.28.05):
“Everyone knows the Vatican is interested in Heaven but it may come as a surprise to some that it is also interested in the heavens.
In this sleepy lakeside village away from the noise and haste of Rome, the Vatican is helping to train tomorrow’s astronomers — regardless of their religious beliefs.”
Pope’s stargazers teach tomorrow’s astronomers
Considering the track record, one wonders just what is being taught. CNN (07.07.99):
“Nearly 400 years after the Roman Catholic church condemned Nicholas Copernicus’s discovery that the Earth revolved around the sun as heresy, Pope John Paul II visited the astronomer’s birthplace and praised his scientific achievements.
‘The discovery made by Copernicus, and its importance for history and science, remind us of the ever-present tension between reason and faith,’ the pope told officials of the university in Torun named after the astronomer.
The church condemned Copernicus’ theory in 1616 and later condemned Galileo for supporting his findings. Copernicus’ book ‘De Revolutionibus Orbium Coelestium’ was banned by the Church until 1822.”
Pope praises once-condemned findings of Copernicus
Actually, in 1633, the Vatican put Galileo on trial “for publishing a book defending Copernicus’s theory that the earth revolves around the sun.” Galileo, sensing which way the wind was blowing on that one, recanted.
In 1992, John Paul acknowledged that the Vatican had made a mistake in trying him. Prior to doing this, the Vatican requested a “Pontifical Academy study” of the matter.
In language which would make the best of the Bush Administration blush, the study concluded that in 1633, “theologians…. failed to grasp the profound non-literal meaning of the Scriptures when they describe the physical structure of the universe. This led them unduly to transpose a question of factual observation into the realm of faith…(and) to a disciplinary measure from which Galileo ‘had much to suffer.'”
This is one of the most amazing sentences we have ever read. We stand in awe.
This guy is pretty cheesed off about the decision. He thinks Galileo was scientifically correct, but philisophically incorrect, and that the “Holy Inquisition, therefore, acted correctly in condemning Galileo.” He also has some more from the Pontifical Study:
“The philosophical and theological qualifications, abusively attributed to the new theories regarding the centrality of the sun and the mobility of earth, were the consequence of a period of transition in the realm of the knowledge of astronomy, and an exegetical confusion regarding cosmology.”
Now, about that evolution thing.